Republibot article featured on the Total Dick Head website.
A few days ago, I published my review of "What if Our World is Their Heaven?" a book about the final heretofore unpublished interview with Phlip K. Dick. You can read my review here if you haven't already. http://www.republibot.com/content/not-quite-science-fiction-book-review-... Suffice to say that I gave it a very good review.
Today the charmingly-offensively-named "Total Dick Head" website did a blog entry on it that is well worth checking out, and I'd advise you all to read it here
http://totaldickhead.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-defense-of-sanity.html
This is our site's first major mention from any of the other big SF websites that I actually like, so that's a red letter day for us. Unfortunately, it's a primarily critical review of my review, so that tempers my glee a litle bit, but here's the deal: They're right.
I enganged in a bit too much gonzo journalism* and reckless, if romantic, speculation, and I kind of did it without even realizing it. The TDH site totally nails me on it, and having re-read my review, I think Ragle Gumm and his crew are on the money: I screwed up. There's not really any excuse for it - I mean, our site is on friendly terms with PKD's widow for gosh sakes! - I could have just asked her for her opinions before I published it, but it never occured to me to do so. So, to Tessa and anyone else I may possibly have offended with my glib, slightly-manic off-the-cuff comments, I apologize.
There are a couple points that TDH chooses to accentuate that I don't think are entirely germane, but ultimately that's my fault too, because I should have done a better job expressing myself when I wrote the damn thing. If I didn't give the right emphasis in a clear fashion, it's certainly not the fault of the reader if they don't get what I was trying to convey.
So here's what I'm gonna' do:
Firstly, I'd ask all of you who read the book review below to please go check out the blog entry about it over at TDH. They give a very strong explanation of where and why I'm wrong. Secondly, I'm going to give some thought to the error of my ways, and then write up an article in which I address my factual errors and post that on here to give a better impression of PKD.
The amazing thing is that despite taking some severe exceptions with my sloppy-assed journalism, Ragle *still* gives us a guardedly positive review, saying that the article *is* worth reading. The man's a class act all around, and his site really is one of the best PKD websites on line.
So: Thank you again, and I'm sorry.
Republibot 3.0
*- Gonzo Journalism: When the reporter spends more time talking about himself and his feelings/experiences than the actual subject at hand
- Republibot 3.0's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Comments
27 December 2008
7 hours 24 min
Yeah, I agree. I've done about as much as I can usefully do here. I toyed with the idea of writing an article about the misconceptions of PKD that I, myself, was prey to, but obviously I'm not really well versed in that it seems, and it kept kind of collapsing in to a "What Philip K. Dick Means To Me" kind of essay that I'm sure no one would want to read, and I don't believe I have any great insights to add to PKD scholarship that would really justify doing it even if someone *did* want to read it.
So.
Moving on....
Anyone here seen "Up" yet?
30 January 2009
3 hours 26 min
One can get so caught up in revising that one never moves on. PKD seemed (to me at least) to be more about getting stuff down and moving on to the next idea. Sometimes it worked, sometimes not. But, like a shark, he kept moving forward. Not a bad strategy, in the long run.
2 March 2009
28 weeks 5 hours
please move on and write more blogs about Phil and others
-- this is a little drop of rain in a thunderstorm
-- it will pass
~~~
reality is not real
27 December 2008
7 hours 24 min
Thanks. Thank you. Thing is, when I was writing it, it all seemed kind of jaunty and fun and, I dunno, I guess I must have been rather manic. I was totally unaware that the tone I was setting down was contrary to what I was going for. Sigh.
So what do you think I should do to rectify this? I figure I should write an article entirely about Mr. Dick to explain things more adequately, but there's just so many ways of going about that...
2 March 2009
28 weeks 5 hours
congrats on making the TDH site.even if it is a mixed review
-- I'm okay with your blog and theirs
~~ Tessa
~~~
reality is not real