Skip to Content

REALSPACE: So how did the shuttles get their names?

Republibot 3.0's picture

I'll be the first to admit this is fairly trivial, but since we no longer have a manned space program, and we don't have any plans for one, and we're grounded for at least a decade, and the Russians and Chinese have moved ahead of us in the space race, what else have we got to do but talk about trivia?

Something we've never really talked about is how the Shuttles got their names. I mean, we all know they're named after seagoing exploratory vessels, (Somewhat pretentiously since the shuttles clearly aren't exploring, nor were they intended to), but how did they end up with that convention?

Well, back in 1978 the Shuttle system associate administrator John Yardley came up with a list of potential names "Having significant relationship to heritage of the United States or the Shuttle' mission of exploration." Here's his list in descending order of preference:

Constitution, Independence, America, Constellation, Enterprise, Discoverer, Endeavour, Liberty, Freedom, Eagle, Kitty Hawk, Pathfinder, Adventurer, Prospector, and Peace.

Why so many names? Well, partially to give NASA and Congress a bunch to pick from, but remember: There was originally supposed to be a fleet of *twelve* shuttles. The four we ended up getting were the result of budget cuts.

Anyway, so the list wasn't particularly popular. I've always maintained that "Enterprise" is just gay, and embarasingly so: 'Hey, let's name a four billion dollar spacecraft after a television show aimed at teenage boys!' "Eagle" is a bad name since it would overshadow the Apollo 11 LEM, and that's a bad thing. 'Peace' is entirely too hippie. Really the only one I like is "Pathfinder." Thus, in late '78, NASA drew up a comittee to come up with a 'naming stragegy.'

They came up with several themes: Bright Stars; Constellations; American aviation history; American history; Exploratory vessels (Which is the one they ultimately chose);
and Indian tribes (The most interesting of the bunch, and I kind of wish they'd gone with that one as it's the least predictable). This was whittled down to just three groups: Exploratory Vessels, American History ("Enterprise" was on both these lists because there were Trekies on the board), and Stars and Constellations.

The Constelaltions were: Orion, Arcturus, Polaris, Pegasus, Canopus, Capella, Alpha Centauri. The "Enterprise" had already been named as it was already in drop-testing at this point. While it ended up being just a glider, it was originally intended to be retrofitted and put into service as an actual shuttle. This never happened for budgetary reasons (And the thing was just way too heavy), but people were quick to point out that "Enterprise" didn't really fit the constellation theme, and since "Polaris" was already in use with the Navy's ICBM program, it was felt that name sent a bad impression, and these two considerations led to that whole scheme being dropped.

After the Challenger Disaster, in memory of Christa MacAulife, there was a nationwide competition for school kids to come up with names for the eventual replacement shuttle: Adventure, Calypso, Catham, Deepstar, Desire, Dove, Endeavour, Godspeed, Hokule 'a, Horizon, Nautilus, North Star, Pathfinder, Phoenix, Resolution, Trieste, Victoria, and Victory. Those were the finalists. Additional serious contenders that didn't make the cut: Blake, Endurance, Griffin, Gulf Stream, Investigator, Meteor, Polar Star, Rising Star, and Royal Tern.

President George Bush the First ultimately chose "Endeavour" from the list (Both the American and British spellings of "Endeavor" were suggested, but he went with the British one)

"Nautilus" and "Trieste" are both submarines, which is an odd choice for a spacecraft, but, hey, points for nonlinear thinking. "Dove" and "Rising Star" are both names of SF space ships ("Journey to the Far Side of the Sun" and "Battlestar Galactica"), though that's probably coincidental, as both were fairly obscure in '88. I personally think I'd like to avoid "Meteor, Gulf Stream, Phoenix, and Deepstar" based soley on how and where the Challenger ended up. "Calypso" isn't bad, though perhaps a bit too froggy for the time. "Investigator" and "Royal Tern" are both just dumb. Really, of the whole list, I think I still prefer "Pathfinder" the best. "Horizon" and "North Star" aren't bad, though.

So how 'bout you? If "Shuttle II" were going into service tomorrow, and they wanted you to come up with a name scheme and some names, what would you come up with? And why?

(Most of this information came from "Space Shuttle: The History of the National Space Transportation System" by Dennis R. Jenkins, which is *THE* authoritative source for all things relating to the development, design, construction, and operation of the shuttle program. It's well worth a look if you're at all interested. If it ain't in this book, it's not worth knowing)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Kevin Long
Offline
Joined: 08/13/2012
Please, call me Kevin

>>I realize you're not a fan of the Shuttle program, and that's your prerogative, R3; but I still get goosebumps when I see video of those engines lighting up.<<

I was there for the first one, and the second, and the fourth. Trust me, I was totally into it at the time. I was also totally into Trek at one point, but I outgrew it. Ditto the Shuttle. I was also on hand for the final ever Saturn V launch, and as much as the shuttle engines firing up for you excites you, well, seeing the Saturn go up feels numinous and almost holy for me.

As Neo points out, based on its promises, the Shuttle program was an unmitigated failure. The vehicles had one failure mode (Catastrophic) and a failure rate of 2:5, based on vehicles. It was an inherently flawed design, and it ended up being vastly more expensive than the allegedly-wasteful stuff it replaced.

Allowing for inflation:
Saturn 5 launch: 500 million dollars, 100 tons of cargo in LEO.
Shuttle launch: 1 billion dollars, 30 tons of cargo in LEO.
That's, what, 6x as expensive pound per pound?

And it killed 14 people.

As someone once said - Stephen Baxter, perhaps? - the Shuttle program was the aerospace equivalent of the Vietnam War: it cost a fortune, wasted an entire generation, and accomplished nothing.

Kevin Long
(The Artist Formerly Known as Republibot 3.0)

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
@Mama Fisi

At the time the Shuttle sounded great but it never lived up to its hype and became a boondoggle. We did not build the full fleet and its turnaround costs never saved money over standard launch systems.

It was a spectacular failure given the program's stated goals coupled with the deaths from the two lost Shuttles. Maybe if NASA had built the second generation Shuttle which was part of the original plan it might have payed off. As is it was a waste of money that lead to a technological dead end.

Mama Fisi
Mama Fisi's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/11/2011
Parallel Universe

We may have grown up in parallel universes, R3--I recall the Shuttle being Pretty Exciting Stuff when I was a kid. At least it was for me, and I wasn't a Trek geek at the time. I just thought it looked beautiful and was bringing us a step nearer to real spaceships like they had in Star Wars. I even stole the design of the Shuttle for a story I wrote when I was fourteen or fifteen. I ate up every snippet of news I came across and because it was novel to me, I thought it was all oh-so-cool.

It was always clear the Enterprise was named in "honor" of the ship on the TV show, but in my part of the country (the East Coast) it was viewed with more of a "well, of course, what else would they call it?" attitude.

I think it was Endeavour that got the "What the hell?" brow wrinkles. No one complained about Columbia, Challenger, or Discovery; Atlantis was another "Ran out of names already, didja?" thing.

I realize you're not a fan of the Shuttle program, and that's your prerogative, R3; but I still get goosebumps when I see video of those engines lighting up.

Masquerading as a normal person day after day is exhausting.
Magpie House Comics
http://www.hirezfox.com/km/

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
no idea

>>Does anyone know how SpaceX came up with Dragon for their capsule instead of NASA'a old Greek name convention.<<

No idea. Probably just thought it sounded cool, and wanted to distinguish themselves from NASA.

In the old days, the Astronauts used to name their own ships. These weren't always the most amazingly beautiful names (Gumdrop, Spider, Charley Brown, Snoopie), but they get points for style (One mission almost went with "Coyote" for the CM and "Road Runner" for the LM) and there's a charm that the high-falutin' Star Trekian approach lacks.

"Enterprise" wasn't part of a contest. It was selected entirely by NASA's own staff of Trek Geeks. As I recall, it was greeted with utter yawns all around. I was pretty excited about it at the time, but I was a Trek geek back then. I couldn't seem to get anyone interested. Congress was embarrassed by the whole situation. (Great. Now we're giving free publicity to shows that have already been cancelled. What's next? Name a shuttle "The Andy Griffith Show?") Hence their demand that they select names in the future.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Mama Fisi
Mama Fisi's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/11/2011
In Hawaiian

I got curious so I looked it up...Hokule'a means "Beautiful Star," near as I can make out. "Hokulele" means "meteor" and "hokulo'a" is "morning star." "Hoku" is "star" and "le'a" is "beautiful."

Masquerading as a normal person day after day is exhausting.
Magpie House Comics
http://www.hirezfox.com/km/

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
Names

At lest NASA gave them names it would have been to sterile to call them by their official designation Space Transportation System (STS).

Does anyone know how SpaceX came up with Dragon for their capsule instead of NASA'a old Greek name convention.

Mama Fisi
Mama Fisi's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/11/2011
Names Mean Things

There are a number of other ships with names from those lists, which would have put them out of contention--Calypso is most famously associated with Jacques Cousteau, for example. Nautilus will always be the name of Captain Nemo's submarine.

The test shuttle got the name "Enterprise" in order to capture the imagination of the public, and if I rememer correctly, the association was actually very popularly received. It was a long time ago, but I even seem to recall that the name was selected in a contest (I may have read about this in World Magazine, the junior version of National Geographic.) And of course as R2 pointed out, there are a number of US Naval vessels named "Enterprise." And the word itself means "something undertaken."

What I'm curious about is the Hawaiian name, Hokule'a, which I assume was submitted for Ellison Onizuka, who also died in the Challenger disaster. There's a science center named in his honor at the Mauna Kea Observatory on the Big Island of Hawai'i.

Personally, ships like the Shuttle should have easy-to remember, easy-to say names that zing, but don't showboat. Liberty and Freedom and America are good--for us--but would annoy the rest of the world. Godspeed would have annoyed the non-Christians. Prospector makes me think of Gabby Hayes.

So I think they did a good job with the names they chose, and, from that list, I'd say I'd favor Constellation, Adventurer, Resolution, and Exploration.

And then there's always Bob.

Masquerading as a normal person day after day is exhausting.
Magpie House Comics
http://www.hirezfox.com/km/

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
The Big E

It does indeed, but the shuttle wasn't named after them, it was very clearly, openly named after the Starship Enterprise, and NASA was pretty pleased with their geekery until Congress told them to knock it off and took away their right to just name spacecraft willy-nilly. (Rightfully so)

The Starship Enterprise was originally to be called the USS Yorktown, but it was decided in preproduction that naming it after the brand-spanking-new Aircraft Carrier Enterprise would give a sense of how big and cutting edge and imposing it was.

So: The WWII Enterprise gave rise to the CVN Enterprise, which gave rise to the Starship Enterprise, which gave rise to the Space Shuttle Enterprise, which caused Trek to have to retcon it so that the Starship Enterprise was named after the space shuttle, as opposed to the other way 'round.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Republibot 2.0
Offline
Joined: 07/11/2011
Enterprise

Yeah, yeah.. the name is mildly polluted with Trek connotations, but you conveniently forget all the U.S. Naval ships that have borne that name, most significantly the U.S.S. Enterprise, CV-6, the most decorated Navy ship in history, with 20 battle stars. Most naval historians call her the most 'glorious and honored ship in the history of the U.S. Navy, rivaled only by the 18th century frigate, the U.S.S Constitution'

The name 'Enterprise' possesses a great heritage that stretches long before Star Trek.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Status

Bleeding Heart does not have a status.

Latest Status Updates

Ginrummy Ray Harryhausen, Visual Effects Master, Dies Aged 92 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper Iron Man 3 review will be live first thing in the morning! 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Second, it reminds us to never stop looking to the future and trying to make it better. Everything Trek's ever stood for 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Observing a fictional event like First Contact Day is, first and foremost, just fun. 2 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: can you comemorate an event before it happens? Or what about celebrating an event that didn't, like September 13th, 1999? 3 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long according to Star Trek, April 5, 2063 will be the day we make FC with the Vulcans. Thus, April 5 is FC day 4 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: Huh? First contact day? 5 weeks ago