Skip to Content

No Ordinary Family: Knockoff or Merely Derivative?

Republibot 3.0's picture

This fall there's a new superhero family series on ABC. When I say "Superhero Family," I assume you're wondering if it's a superhero show aimed at 'the whole family from baby to grandpa' or if it's a show about a family of superheroes. In this case it appears to be both.

Here's the trailer:

So let's see: You've got the indestructable super-strong dad, the hot super-fast mom, the super-smart-but-troubled-in-school son, and the cheerleader daughter/telepath. And you've got the middle aged black sidekick. And they do what here? Save the world? Fight crime? Pretty much it's got to be that, or superpowered PTA bakesales, right? I dunno, this is all seeming overly familiar. Hm. I wonder where I could have seen something like this before...I can't...quite...remember...

But probably no one but me ever even saw that movie.

Seriously, though, my initial reaction is "Wow, ABC really doesn't have anything in the pipeline to replace Lost, now does it?" Despite the obviously derivative nature, it's really kind of a bad trailer - all the dialog seems kind of stilted, expositional, and of course the trailer is too long and pretty much tells you everything about the pilot, thus making it superfluous to actually watch the episode. And it just feels off, you know? It feels like an "ABC Family" show (From the makers of '10 Things I Hate About You!') rather than a broadcast ABC show. It's got 13-episodes-and-done written all over it.

Anyway, as it's a superhero show, and that's vaguely SF, we'll give it a shot for a while. Neorandomizer - who, by the way, first pointed this show out to me - will be reviewing it.

Thanks, Neo!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
Should have read the comic before writing the movie

As a fan of the FF from when I was a kid in the 60's the problem with the movies is they used the newer personalities of the characters instead of the silver age ones.

The original origin of Doctor Doom and his hatred of Reed Richards was more natural than what happened in the first FF movie. The producers went for a twofer on the origin front and screwed both up.

The silver age FF were likable but these new ones are just whinny and Johny Storm was too much the idiot instead of just being young. Also the love story between Sue Storm and Richards did not have any chemistry in the movie. Ben Grimm in the comic was a regular New York guy and they did not play that aspect up enough.

Note in the silver age Victor von Doom and Reed Richards were in college together. Doom was doing an experiment to contact a parallel dimension Reed discovered an error in Doom's calculations and tried to stop Doom but he was too late and there was an explosion. Doom was badly disfigured and blamed Richards when in reality it was his fault. All of Doom's powers come from his suit like Iron Man and magic he learned after the accident not from cosmic rays like the FF.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Everything New is Old Again

>>>Stop worrying about which of the five (or seven, or twelve) stories that are being raided and focus on whether they work!<<<

Another, more interesting question might be "Why does a Ripoff of the Fantastic Four work so well, while the Fantastic Four themselve kinda' suck?"

When the knockoff is better than the source, clearly, the source is doing something wrong.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
John hard at work

R3 here are two articles on the John Carter of Mars movie

http://www.ecprogress.com/index.php?tier=1&article_id=9387

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/GulfCoastAvengers/news/?a=19014

As a would be writer I both decry and practice the art of stealing ideas, it's hard not too.

Church
Church's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/30/2009
Arggghhhh!

I hate this talk of 'ripoffs' et al.

Everything borrows from something. Hell, the Incredibles are a vaguely reimagined Fantastic Four.

Stop worrying about which of the five (or seven, or twelve) stories that are being raided and focus on whether they work!

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Yet

Not 'yet', it's more like 'ever.' They don't appear to have any plans to revisit that one, and their dance card is full for the next five years.

(Interestingly, the "John Carter" movie has been taken off their announced development slate. Dunno what that means)

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

sysadmin 2.0
sysadmin 2.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/23/2008
Ordinary? Incredible? Fantastic!

The Incredibles itself was more than a touch derivative of the Fantastic Four. In fact, most FF fans called it the best media adaptation of the Fantastic Four Ever (Exclamation points omitted for decorum's sake)

That said, since Pixar isn't burning up the processor time to make Incredibles 2 (yet...), I think it's cool that they (in their secret identity as ABC-TV)are taking core themes and exploring them in a series.

Plus, Julie Benz and Michael Chiklis! Awesome!

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
If Greatest American Hero and the Incredibles had a baby

Well with the dad being a cop I thought the family would be helping him with a crook of the week. The bad guys will of course use super science (vs regular science) and have special powers too so its not them beating on regular street criminals.

The show that is really a ripoff is NBC's 'The Cape' Batman meets the Spirit.

Wow I did not know you could text god I wonder if she will give me his number?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Status

Bleeding Heart does not have a status.

Latest Status Updates

Ginrummy Ray Harryhausen, Visual Effects Master, Dies Aged 92 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper Iron Man 3 review will be live first thing in the morning! 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Second, it reminds us to never stop looking to the future and trying to make it better. Everything Trek's ever stood for 3 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Observing a fictional event like First Contact Day is, first and foremost, just fun. 3 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: can you comemorate an event before it happens? Or what about celebrating an event that didn't, like September 13th, 1999? 3 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long according to Star Trek, April 5, 2063 will be the day we make FC with the Vulcans. Thus, April 5 is FC day 4 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: Huh? First contact day? 5 weeks ago