Skip to Content

MOVIE REVIEW: The Dark Knight Rises

SheldonCooper's picture

Well, here we are, my review of The Dark Knight Rises. It's a week late, but I'm sure you'll all agree that the delay was both necessary and worth it, as giving people a little extra time to see the movie allows us to have a better discussion of it. If you didn't catch my DC Update last week, I will offer one last warning. The following review contains MASSIVE SPOILERS. If you haven't seen the movie yet, I highly suggest you do not read on any further.

The final chapter of Christopher Nolan's "Dark Knight Trilogy", The Dark Knight Rises picks up the story eight years after the death of Harvey Dent/Two-Face in the previous film, The Dark Knight. With Batman taking the rap for the Two-Face murders in order to save Gotham City from having to see her white knight go down, Bruce Wayne has hung up his cape and cowl and become something of a recluse, locking himself up in Wayne Manor. Most of his own servants have never even seen him. He has also managed to bring Wayne Industries to near bankruptcy, having moth-balled a very expensive project in renewable energy, because the nuclear source was too easily converted into a bomb.

Enter Bane, an exiled member of Ra's al Ghul's League of Shadows. Bane has come to Gotham with a small army to finish the job Ra's started in Batman Begins, the destruction of Gotham City. Where Ra's used economics the first time he tried to destroy Gotham and fear the second, Bane has decided to use class warfare to bring anarchy to the city. Hmmm... does any of this sound familiar to anyone? To make a long story short (since we've all seen the film), Batman returns to defeat Bane, ends up being broken over Bane's knee (ala Batman 497) and is thrown into a prison that Bane himself (we're led to believe) had once escaped (ala the Vengeance of Bane one-shot). The broken Batman then retrains his mind and his body to come back and defeat Bane, who is going to use the Wayne Industries power source which he had converted into the nuclear bomb Bruce Wayne had feared would happen, to blow the city to hell and back. Batman disposes of the bomb, but dies (we're led to believe) in the process.

Ok, first of all, this was not just a great end to the Nolan trilogy, it was honestly the perfect end to the Batman story as a whole. Batman may have "died" saving Gotham, but Bruce Wayne managed to somehow survive and has given up Batman-ing in favor of a happy, normal life with Selina Kyle (AKA Catwoman) somewhere in Europe. It's nice to see Bruce put his obsession behind him and just disappear into the shadows, only to emerge in a world brighter and happier than one he's known since he was ten. Maybe I'm sappy, but it gave me a good feeling to see Bruce Wayne finally happy. Another thing I enjoyed was that, unlike the previous films in the series, this wasn't so much Christopher Nolan making a Batman movie as it was a Christopher Nolan movie that just happened to have Batman in it some. It's extremely difficult to make a third movie in a series feel fresh, but Nolan definitely pulled it off here.

The Dark Knight Rises was definitely and 80% perfect movie. There were some lame things. I felt the Robin nudge at the end was pretty lame. I mean, the guy's name is John Blake (not Dick Grayson), and he never wears red or green, so he isn't really Robin. He's still just a cop whose first name just happened to be Robin. Nolan tried to be cute, but it was lame. Also, Bane's size seemed to fluctuate a bit throughout the movie. I honestly think they started filming before Tom Hardy (Praetor Shinzon, Star Trek: Nemesis) had gotten as big as he was ultimately going to get. There's really only one scene where he's noticable smaller, but I also think that's why he wears the fur coat so often. To mask that he's not as big as in other scenes. It wasn't really distracting to the movie or anything, just something I noticed. I also hated that the young child who escaped from the prison (Pena Duro on the comics, unnamed in the film), who you're led to believe was Bane through the entire movie, was actually Ra's al Ghul's daughter Talia. I thought that was lame because it was just such a perfect retelling of Bane's origin from the comics that I thought making the child Talia just ruined all of the attention to detail they used in bringing the comic story to the screen. While we're on the lame topic, throw the Batplane up on that list too. While it looked cool, it didn't look like the Batplane. Honestly, it looked a lot more like Blue Beetle's flying beetle and everytime they showed it I just kept thinking how much more awesome it would have been had it actually been in a Blue Beetle movie instead of Batman.

TDKR also borrowed extensively from various comics, and I enjoyed that immensely. Vengeance of Bane is used, the breaking of the Batman was right out of the Knightfall storyline and even Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns is used a little bit. It wasn't an adaptation of any one comic story, but it definitely was truer to the elements it did use than any Batman movie before it. I've always liked Bane as a villain and after being just absolutely disappointed by the depiction of the character in Joel Schumacher's Batman & Robin, it was nice to see the character finally done properly. Jonathan Crane (Scarecrow) also makes a welcome appearance, making him the only villain to appear in all three movies, though I did think the part he played might actually have originally been intended for the Joker before Heath Ledger's untimely death. Cillian Murphy did a great job, it just seemed like more of a Joker part than a Scarecrow part. And I was a little disappointed that he didn't wear his Scarecrow mask.

All in all, The Dark Knight Rises was a great movie. The Dark Knight was a better Batman movie, but I don't know to sat it was a better overall movie or not. The two are definitely close. I also think The Dark Knight Rises was a better movie than The Avengers, even though Avengers is still ahead in box office revenue as of right now. The Dark Knight Rises is most certainly recommended, not just to Batman fans, but to anyone who enjoys just a really great movie.

Will Conservatives Like This Movie?

Yes. It has very conservative themes, such as the evils of using class warfare to divide a society in order to make it that much easier to destroy it. Bane most times sounds like a poster boy for the Occupy movement, but he doesn't really believe the crap he's spitting. He's using class warfare for nothing more than to divide the people to suit his own agenda, which is, of course, to control them. I'm sure it was unintentional, but Bane really did seem to be a parallel to the Democrat agenda and the policies of the Obama administration.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
SheldonCooper
SheldonCooper's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/02/2010
Batman Done Properly

>>I think the last "Batman" film I saw was the one with Poison Ivy. They were becoming increasingly serious and I kinda lost interest in the franchise.<<

Definitely check out the Christopher Nolan Bat-flicks, Batman Begins and The Dark Knight (and, of course, this one). If you're not familiar with Christopher Nolan as a filmmaker, he made Momento, Insomnia, The Prestige and Inception. He excels in the psychological thriller genre, and he brings the same psy-thriller tone to Batman, which fits the character perfectly. Even if you're only a luke warm Bat-fan, the Nolan movies will make you a true believer (please don't sue me, Stan Lee).

One lab accident away from being a supervillain! Bazinga!

SheldonCooper
SheldonCooper's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/02/2010
Perhaps

>>So unintentional, you're the only one who saw it.<<

Perhaps, but at least that makes more sense than when the liberals were trying to say the character Bane was an intentional dig at Romney and Bain. Incidentally, Chuck Dixon and Graham Nolan, the writer and artist who created Bane for the comics, are both life-long conservatives and they publicly released a statement about how hard they laughed at hearing the liberals say that.

You bring up an interesting point about dictators and class warfare. Seeing as that's Obama's only real rally point, what does that say about our wannabe Emperor-in-Chief?

If they do decide to continue the story beyond this movie there are 2 directions I would like to see it go:

1. Don't make anymore "Batman" movies. Detective Blake does not become Batman. He uses Batman's stuff and starts using the name Nightwing. Nightwing was a cop for a bit in the comics, and I could forgive that Nightwing isn't Dick Grayson if the movies were made well. I've always liked the Nightwing character, which I've mentioned before. A Nightwing Trilogy could be interesting.

2. This would be the better idea, but it has the least chance of happening. John Blake does become Batman, but he becomes unstable and not very Batman-like, acting much like Azrael did when he was Batman after Bruce was broken by Bane. Even adopting the Az-Bat costume. The first sets him up, the second movie he just loses his mind and the third movie you bring Bale back (if he will, otherwise just re-cast Bruce Wayne) to come in a kick the new Batman's ass. The end.

Those are IF they continue within the Nolan-verse. Personally, I'd like to see them, if more movies are to be made, just do their own thing and not connect to the Nolan trilogy at all. Not a full reboot, because I don't want Batman Begins again. Just a new Batman, new story and maybe this time they can do Robin right. Perhaps with the Jason Todd character?

>>Since the only Batman comics I ever read was the actual "Dark Night" series from the 1980's, I didn't get whatever fan-service was thrown into the film, nor did I have an expectation of who should have done what. And I think the discussion has come up before about whether a film needs to be a word-by-word retelling of the source material - comics or novels - or if it's OK to let it be another entry into a long narrative.<<

If you didn't know, The Dark Knight Returns is being adapted as a 2-part animated movie. Part 1 comes out in October. The guys doing the DCU animated dvd films have been great at adapting comic storylines and if you liked TDKR comics, you'll probably love the movie. I recommend you check out the Batman: Year One movie, also based on a Frank Miller book. Or at least my review of it here.

One lab accident away from being a supervillain! Bazinga!

Republibot 4.0
Republibot 4.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/09/2012
Call Me The Joker

Sorry, couldn't help myself...and yeah, pretty bad taste there...this is why I never used to comment here much...

I think the last "Batman" film I saw was the one with Poison Ivy. They were becoming increasingly serious and I kinda lost interest in the franchise.

I am waiting, though, for the first "Batman parody film" to appear, and it will probably be just like the Adam West version.

10000li
10000li's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/23/2009
Not only unintentional, not even there

"I'm sure it was unintentional, but Bane really did seem to be a parallel to the Democrat agenda and the policies of the Obama administration."

So unintentional, you're the only one who saw it.

Every right-wing and left-wing dictator (and dictator-wannabe) uses class warfare to segregate the population and create hatred among the groups so they waste time fighting each other rather than recognizing they are all under the same jack-boot.

For a moment, I thought there was going to be a scene where Batman was going to attempt to stop the looting or something and the person he was stopping was someone he had saved from thugs earlier in the movie. But this wasn't that thoughtful of a movie, and Batman isn't really that thoughtful of a guy.

I agree that the sequence turning 3rd Rock Tommy into Robin was pretty forced, but you knew it was coming from the first instant you saw him on the screen. Nolan says he's done with the series, but $$omeone convinced him he needed to leave it open for the next director/producer. Gordon-Levitt is a good actor, but I don't know if he's got any tragedy inside to draw on to make a Batman-ish character work.

Since the only Batman comics I ever read was the actual "Dark Night" series from the 1980's, I didn't get whatever fan-service was thrown into the film, nor did I have an expectation of who should have done what. And I think the discussion has come up before about whether a film needs to be a word-by-word retelling of the source material - comics or novels - or if it's OK to let it be another entry into a long narrative.

I'm glad this series was made, just as I was glad to read TDK when it first came out. I agree that these movies stand pretty well just as movies that happen to have Batman in them. At the same time, I don't think they would have had the same feeling if they were not centered around such a well-known character, and they certainly would never have made sense without "The Dark Night" comic series having pushed the Batman legend in the right direction.

SheldonCooper
SheldonCooper's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/02/2010
Really?!

A movie as utterly fantastic as The Dark Knight Rises and all I'm getting are corny jokes? Did anyone but me actually see this movie?!

One lab accident away from being a supervillain! Bazinga!

Republibot 4.0
Republibot 4.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/09/2012
Capes and nappies

Would their kids get Bat-mitzvah'd?

SheldonCooper
SheldonCooper's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/02/2010
Bat-burbia

>>Can you imagine living in suburbia next to Mr. & Mrs. Batman?<<

"I don't blend in at a family picnic"
--Val Kilmer as Batman
"Batman Forever"

One lab accident away from being a supervillain! Bazinga!

Mama Fisi
Mama Fisi's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/11/2011
Shy and Retiring?

*chuckles* I wonder how a person goes about "retiring" from being a Superhero? Can you imagine living in suburbia next to Mr. & Mrs. Batman? Would he be out there mowing the lawn on a Snapper lawn tractor with afterburners? Could you imagine Catwoman showing up at the PTA or the Red Hat Society?

And would he trade the Justice League for the Bowling League?

Masquerading as a normal person day after day is exhausting.
Magpie House Comics
http://www.hirezfox.com/km/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Status

Bleeding Heart does not have a status.

Latest Status Updates

Ginrummy Ray Harryhausen, Visual Effects Master, Dies Aged 92 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper Iron Man 3 review will be live first thing in the morning! 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Second, it reminds us to never stop looking to the future and trying to make it better. Everything Trek's ever stood for 3 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Observing a fictional event like First Contact Day is, first and foremost, just fun. 3 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: can you comemorate an event before it happens? Or what about celebrating an event that didn't, like September 13th, 1999? 3 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long according to Star Trek, April 5, 2063 will be the day we make FC with the Vulcans. Thus, April 5 is FC day 4 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: Huh? First contact day? 5 weeks ago