Skip to Content

HOW NOT TO LOOK LIKE AN IDIOT: Lesson 3: “Conspiracy Theories”

Republibot 3.0's picture

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED ON 9/23/09

These (Were) trying times for Republicans (When this article was first written). Not only did we lose the (2008) election, we got pantsed. Control of both houses and the presidency have been lost. We’re involved in two unpopular wars, we‘re bordering on a third, the government is deeply in debt, the international economy is in the crapper, and whether wrong or right, the strong public consensus is that it’s entirely our fault. Whether you’re a die-hard Bush supporter, or a moderate who feels mistakes were made, I think it’s pretty obvious that the party and its members are having a bit of an image problem right now.

To that end, I humbly submit this guide on how we can change our reputation and not be perceived as paranoid racists and raving religious fanatics, at least on a one-to-one basis.

(I'm re-printing this series, even though we're winning now, simply because we *can* still blow it. Anything that helps us avoid that is a good thing, right?)

LESSON 3: “Conspiracy Theories”

I have this shirttail relative, an uncle who was always showing up and having long, seemingly-rational discussions about conspiracies. He was one of those guys who seemed smooth - good clothes, good diction, good delivery, seemed to be very well educated, and knew what he was talking about. Of course he was barking nuts, but I was too young to know it. He’d rail on over dinner in the 1970s about how “Washington and Moscow are not enemies, they’re working together, and Moscow is calling the shots,” and about how the Freemasons run the country, nay the world, and soon nothing (Excepting the John Birch Society) would stand in their way to prevent them from their evil goal of…uhm…ruling the world? Wait, don’t they rule the world already? That can’t be it. Anyway, soon there will be nothing to stop the freemasons from achieving their nefarious goal, whatever it is…Now that I’m thinking about it, I’m pretty sure it’s got something to do with the Crab Nebula, but I could be wrong. I assume that’s nefarious, but I don’t really know why. I mean, if they already *ran* the world, wouldn’t their purpose be better described as “Status Quo?”

I digress: The point is that I loved the hell out of my uncle, and always looked forward to his visits. I was less enamored of his son, my cousin, who used to beat me up whenever they crashed at our house, but, eh. That’s life, I suppose. My uncle, though, was great. He’d wax on about the secret - and disturbing - nature of the Democratic party; he’d explain (To everyone’s clear annoyance) about why using decaffeinated coffee was *good* for enemas, but regular coffee was bad; he’d tell us all about how all the world’s ills could easily be cured by chiropractors, if only the damn evil satanic AMA would stop blocking their medical accreditation. I loved listening to him. He seemed like one of those knowledgeable, urbane, fatherly Dr. Kildare types, who just know stuff. Even when I was a bit older, and I began to realize that he was off his nut most of the time, I still liked listening to him. His world seemed so much more vital and passionate than the real one, so much more interesting. Shadow governments, eternal struggles between illuminati and an equally-shadowy band of republican businessmen in central Georgia, wildly revisionist history, samizdated newsletters with terrible grammar, egregious spelling errors, and alarming accusations that you could never trace back to their source- it was all so much more interesting than my world of spelling tests and will-she-or-won’t-she-go-skating-with-me anxiety. Although I was pretty sure the world didn’t work the way my uncle said it did by the time I was 16 or so, I still felt like it’s the way the world *should* work. It was just so much more fun his way.

Of course my uncle had mental problems out the ying yang. I’m not saying this to make fun of him (Though that’s your loss, it’s always a laugh-riot when it happens), just to point out that we’ve all met a lot of these seemingly-sane crazy people, and occasionally we listen to them more than we should. And if their schizophrenic babblings are repeated enough times, they become an urban legend and then a cultural meme, and there’s just no getting rid of them, no matter what you do. You can be the most rational, well-meaning, non-insane person in the

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
Chaos and the world

The world is the living example of Chaos Theory and will never make sense no matter how hard we try.

10000li
10000li's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/23/2009
Further clarification

Mama Fisi,

I was responding directly to this last line of your comment:

"Secular people do this with conspiracy theories."

I was pointing out that secularists are no more likely to believe conspiracy theories than are the rest of the population.

Secularists that I know do often rely on other conceits to "make sense of the world." The most common is "scientism," the idea that science provides all the answers. This overlaps with Secular Humanism (with caps), an organized philosophy that specifically takes the questions other people answer with religion and provides non-religious alternative answers. Probably third in line for secular folks is a form of intense environmentalism that borders on, and even overlaps, Gaiaism.

***

As for me, I make sense of the world through fiat and apathy. I've decided the world makes sense because I wish it to, and when it doesn't, I don't care - it doesn't stop me. I just keep going and, eventually, it all makes sense again.

Which is really the same as what the rest of you do: You just label the decision that the world makes sense "religion," and you label the decision to keep going when it doesn't "faith."

Mama Fisi
Mama Fisi's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/11/2011
Tin hat brigade

It wasn't *my* suggestion, 10000li, I was referring to comments #9 & #10 by Flabberghasted and R3.

And I know we've gone round this mulberry bush before, but I do need to point out that just because *your* dog doesn't bark, doesn't mean that no dog barks. Over the course of human history, far more people have expressed religious or mythmaking inclinations than those who felt "Nope--this is all that is."

I guess you could say that the majority of people feel better if they believe someone or something is "in control," and that our lives aren't just a random series of accidents. So they cling to religion, or superstition, or conspiracy theories in order to make their concept of the world easier to digest. They make up fairy tales and folk stories to explain stuff they don't quite understand. They put their trust in horoscopes and in fortune cookies and "qi" in order to make their lives run more smoothly and bring them more luck.

I appreciate the fact that you, personally, don't believe in any oif that stuff. But that's not to say that humanity doesn't, either, or that humans in general don't feel a need for some form of superstition to help give them an edge in a world that they barely understand.

Masquerading as a normal person day after day is exhausting.
Magpie House Comics
http://www.hirezfox.com/km/

Jim Stiles
Jim Stiles's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/04/2011
Re: Why we need the nutters

(the Air Force only accepts people with 80% or above on their ASVAB scores, at least when I was in)

Back in Reagan's first term, the USMC required higher ASVAB scores than the USAF.

10000li
10000li's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/23/2009
Why we need the nutters

I read a couple of stories in "Analog" magazine in the quite a few years ago that relied on a similar plot device: We need the nutters to remind us of the limits beyond which we should not go.

In one story, folks were in a space station and a guy showed up who committed just about every faux pas imaginable: Didn't wash right, ate other people's food, made inappropriate comments about other people, etc. When the guy used his body to block a hull breach, he told the story's narrator to check out a certain psychology paper. The narrator read the paper and learned something very important:

Humans, and other animals, base our idea of "normal" on what everyone else is doing. The consequence for small, isolated groups is that the behaviors can drift a long way from normal in a short time, especially in those groups with charismatic leaders (Jim Jones, Fred Phelps, etc.) This is because everyone is using the behaviors of others as guideposts, and in the case of a strong leader, the members of the group are using him our her as the main indicator of what is acceptable and what is not.

In the story I talked about above, the protagonist was actually a psychologist, sent to the station to remind people what kinds of behavior were unacceptable, to help prevent them from drifting too far from the mainstream.

At the time I was reading that story and the others like it, I was stationed at an Air Force base in Germany. What I noticed was that the people I worked with had very strange ideas about who they were and what their role was in the world, and how they should interact with the locals. Very few people (less than 5%) did anything "on thee economy" as we called it. Most people preferred to live on base, shop on base and party on base. If they could not find what they were looking for on their own base, they would drive to another base to get it, no matter that there were fine shops with the very thing in the German town right next door.

So the Americans I met overseas tended to self-isolate. On top of that, people who are recruited into the Air Force tend to be from the better-qualified stratum of general military candidates (the Air Force only accepts people with 80% or above on their ASVAB scores, at least when I was in). That means mos tof them thought they normal. Over time, what was acceptable behavior on the not-so-big base where I was stationed had moved quite a ways from what people in mainstream American society would be OK with. Adultery was pretty rife - we had a group of women we referred to as "TDY widows" who'd show up at the club the first evening their husbands went off on temporary duty assignments. Treating Germans as lesser beings was also pretty common (Germans as lesser beings? Really?) There were other things that made me realize that the people on base were kinda crazy, but they all thought they were normal. When I read the stories like the one I talked about above, it opened my eyes and solidified in me the desire to move off base as quickly as possible. For the remainder of my time in Germany, I was only on base when I had to be. The rest of my time I spent with Germans and other Americans who chose to live off base.

Anyway, what I'm getting at is that we need the nutters to remind us what deviant behavior looks like. If we didn't have them to show us what is "wrong," then pretty soon, we'd start believing that *everything* we were doing was right. And, I hate to say it but it's true, we need to treat deviant behaviors with some scorn and derision so that anyone who is on the fence about whether something they are planning to do is right or wrong realizes they will be punished for drifting too far from the herd.

Nutters help keep society stable. They show us what not to be like because of how they are treated. This prevents too much social volatility. The downside is that it takes a very long time to move from a society where Oscar Wilde is sent to prison for two years of hard labor for having boyfriends to one in which same-gender adults can finally marry each other legally (for example).

10000li
10000li's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/23/2009
Conspiracy Theories: It's what's for supper

Hat tip to R3 (who is still wearing his own hat) with my subject line.

Regarding R3's intuition that any group of non-mainstream people comprise only about 3% of the population as a whole, he is in the ball park, though a little low. In a bell curve, 65% of the occurrences are within one standard deviation of the mean, 95.45% are within 2 s.d.'s of the mean and 99.73% are within 3 s.d.'s of the mean. Most of us, then are within 2 s.d.'s of the mean, for any behavior. Test it for yourself: Pick any behavior you think of as "mainstream" and collect data about how many people do that behavior. You'll find that the curve plots out pretty well with a bell shape.

If the people R3 talks about can still function in society, then their behavior cannot be more than 3 s.d.'s from the mean. That means they are in the group between 95.43% and 99.73%.

99.73 - 95.45 = 4.28%

In a roundabout way, this disproves Mama Fisi's implied link between secularism and conspiracy theories. If you take the subset of the population labelled as secularists and collect data on if they believe conspiracy theories or not, you will find a normal distribution of conspiracy believers and non-believers: 95% or so of secularists will not believe in conspiracies or find conspiracies hard to believe and only about 4 or 5% will believe in conspiracies.

However, if you ask people the question, "Do you believe that people outside your group believe things that are just not true?" you will again, find a normal distribution, in that 95% of respondents will believe that those folks over there are nuts.

Scorpious
Scorpious's picture
Online
Joined: 05/11/2010
Still waiting..

>>If there are any recruiters for *valid* super-secret world-domination conspiracies out there reading this, I'd be happy to send in my CV ;-)<<

Just as an update, no recruiters have yet contacted me, so my life hasn't yet gone on a whirlwind of intrigue, espionage, and conspiracy-funded globetrotting.

Maybe now that this thread is bumped up, though, it'll catch their attention :-D

[[I do get very regular updates from one looney semi-relative, however, about the banking crisis in the EU, mixed in with Venus alignments and reptilian shapeshifters, and how we're all doomed unless we educate ourselves and refuse to be exterminated. Those aren't even remotely interesting.]]

Mama Fisi
Mama Fisi's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/11/2011
Well done!

This was just BRILLIANT! Thanks to whomever dredged it up and got it onto the Popular Content header--I laughed my butt off! R3, you are one of the wittiest and most perceptive writers I've had the pleasure to read!

And I think the notion that secular people are attracted to Conspiracy Theories because it fires the same neurons that religion and/or superstition does, is more valid than you think. A while back, we were discussing atheism vs. religion, and the thought came up that human beings have a deep-seated need or instinct for religion. 10000li, as an atheist, disagreed with this, but I think the overwhelming number of people in the world, now and throughout human history, have an intellectual need for someone or something to be "in control." So they invent demons and gods and angels and fairies, tell stories about them, and eventually codify the stories into a religion.

Secular people do this with conspiracy theories.

Masquerading as a normal person day after day is exhausting.
Magpie House Comics
http://www.hirezfox.com/km/

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
wrong place

doh

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
asteroids

>>I'm suprised nobody has talked about mining the asteroid belt to solve our economic woes.<<

I've talked about it a lot. Thing is, we just don't have the spacefaring chops. It'd be like trying to sail across the Atlantis in a dugout canoe. Possible, but not likely. And once you got there, how much cargo could you carry back again? Asteroid mining will make us rich beyond the dreams of avarice, but no space agency has ever been remotely interested in it.

>>I hope they decide to do a Defying Gravity Grand Tour mission. I would sign up in a heartbeat.<<

Seen this?

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Jim Stiles
Jim Stiles's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/04/2011
Re: They're only Faking

I hope they decide to do a Defying Gravity Grand Tour mission. I would sign up in a heartbeat.

How old are you? You may be too old already for when they gain the capability to do such a mission.

nwkeys01
nwkeys01's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/22/2009
They're only Faking

How many of you would be okay with big name people "faking" something in order for us to not be so lazy in some area (space exploration)

I'm suprised nobody has talked about mining the asteroid belt to solve our economic woes.

Let's say NASA decides to bring in a lot of people and fakes an alien message ala the movie Contact or something, so money flows to space to build spaceships etc.

I hope they decide to do a Defying Gravity Grand Tour mission. I would sign up in a heartbeat.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
the cold war

>>Today, everything is "sanitized," and I think a crucial element is that there's no clear "enemy" anymore--or what enemies there are are nebulous entities like "terrorism" or "drugs" or "unfair competition" that fighting against is much less romantic and heroic than adding a new colony to your empire or intriguing at the court of the Czars or expanding your railroad network into the Wild West was. Without any real, romantic-style enemies, life is much duller, and those of us who might have gone on to be colorful explorers, adventurers, imperialists, spies, etc, for and against clear, defined entities, find ourselves struggling to find something or someone to fight. I'm not saying that those things were all good, but they did provide clear-cut "them vs us" situations that people could identify with and which are much more theoretical in today's world than back then.<<

I've long said the end of the cold war was the word thing that ever happened in that it utterly broke down any sense of direction we had, and now we (as a people) can't get crap done no matter how hard we try.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
the duck book

>>>Some are just too afraid to face the intrinsic random quality of life. Some just like to feel special. They may not have much going on in their life, but your better than all the drones who don't see "the truth." And, of course, some are just genuinely mentally ill.<<<

Yes. I've often wondered if it's related to the religious instinct. If you're a believer (As I am) then you believe God (or gods or The Divine Nam or whomever) is watching over the world, and at least occasionally manipulating events, at least slightly. "Yes, this sucks, but it's for some greater purpose since all things ultimately work together for good." It's a way of casting off existential angst and nihilistic meaninglessness.

Now that we live in a largely irreligious society (Or perhaps simply a society in which the traditional way of doing religion no longer meets our needs cf the Roman Empire c. 100 BC) this instinct is sort of casting about. No one wants to be nihilistic, so the instinct sort of gloms on to the first 'these events have significance' thing they can find, and this largely fills the role of religion in their lives.

Or so it seems. Or so I've wondered.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Flabbergasted
Offline
Joined: 10/20/2010
"As was once stated in Star

"As was once stated in Star Trek: The Next Generation, of all places, “Conspiracies are almost never suspected if they’re real, and almost never real if they’re suspected.” That’s true.

That doesn’t mean conspiracies don’t exist, but most non-hallucinatory conspiracies are fairly short-term, goal-oriented, and pretty obvious. The easiest answer is most likely the correct one."

Very true. A few months ago I had the odd experience of having to do some work on a project that involved one individual who had lost it on conspiracies. He was full of them. He even regaled me repeatedly about how the key to a Republican victory in 2012 was for every candidate to focus like a laser on Obama's birth certificiate. It was irritating but kind of interesting to observe the hard core conspiracy freak in the wild. He was more or less able to function in the world, did one thing very well, but came across as stark raving mad at times.

"Also it is scary to some people to think that history just happens with little rime or reason. It scary to think that leaders of nations are just as clueless as the next guy, that wars, starvation and economic collapse happen because governments and leaders don’t have a clue to want they are doing. It is comforting to think that there is a plan for this entire mess even if the people doing the planning are evil and against you."

This. Some are just too afraid to face the intrinsic random quality of life. Some just like to feel special. They may not have much going on in their life, but your better than all the drones who don't see "the truth." And, of course, some are just genuinely mentally ill.

Scorpious
Scorpious's picture
Online
Joined: 05/11/2010
Pick me

>>His world seemed so much more vital and passionate than the real one, so much more interesting. Shadow governments, eternal struggles between illuminati and an equally-shadowy band of republican businessmen in central Georgia, wildly revisionist history, samizdated newsletters with terrible grammar, egregious spelling errors, and alarming accusations that you could never trace back to their source- it was all so much more interesting than my world of spelling tests and will-she-or-won’t-she-go-skating-with-me anxiety. Although I was pretty sure the world didn’t work the way my uncle said it did by the time I was 16 or so, I still felt like it’s the way the world *should* work. It was just so much more fun his way.<<

Besides everything else you and the commenters pointed out, I think this is a big part of the appeal of conspiracies. It seems like things used to be so much more exciting in a golden age "back then". In the 1800s, there was a Great Game going on in Asia, rival empires were actively competing in Africa, Europe was a mess of constantly-shifting alliances and secret treaties, the US was building a new nation, etc. It seems like it was so much easier to make a mark and play a big role in events than it is now. Actually, all the way from the time of the 3 Musketeers up until the Bond days of the 60s or so.

Today, everything is "sanitized," and I think a crucial element is that there's no clear "enemy" anymore--or what enemies there are are nebulous entities like "terrorism" or "drugs" or "unfair competition" that fighting against is much less romantic and heroic than adding a new colony to your empire or intriguing at the court of the Czars or expanding your railroad network into the Wild West was. Without any real, romantic-style enemies, life is much duller, and those of us who might have gone on to be colorful explorers, adventurers, imperialists, spies, etc, for and against clear, defined entities, find ourselves struggling to find something or someone to fight. I'm not saying that those things were all good, but they did provide clear-cut "them vs us" situations that people could identify with and which are much more theoretical in today's world than back then.

My life isn't particularly sad or boring, and I don't believe in the kind of conspiracies you're talking about, but a part of me wishes some did exist--a reasonably large part, if I'm honest, heh, because wouldn't life be so much more exciting? People who read the news and interpret the most mundane announcements as part of "The Plan" and are always on the lookout for the next clues to support their ideas are kind of pitiful, because they're clearly bonkers and their particular conspiracies are clearly nonsense. But if there are any recruters for *valid* super-secret world-domination conspiracies out there reading this, I'd be happy to send in my CV ;-)

John Many Jars
John Many Jars's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2011
I agree

Doug Stanhope has it right:

"Nothing of any significance will ever happen to you in your entire, boring life."

... believing in this stuff is "far more palatable".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Oww4Ap3YZA

(In case there are sensitive Scots Guardsmen present, Doug swears a bit).

He is totally, absolutely right.

"No matter where you go, there you are."

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
3%

As a rule of thumb, I tend to assume the rule of 3%, which is to say the people who differ from the 'norm' usually statistically fall in to that range. I don't know why. I don't attach a lot of significance to it, it's just a handy number to know: about 3% of the population are homosexual, about 3% of the population will commit a major crime in their lifetimes, about 3% of the population actively believe conspiracy theories, about 3% of the population will have profound mentall illness, etc.

Of course you can't really get accurate numbers because the first thing anyone in these marginal groups does is inflate their numbers in order to seem more important, so, for instance, homosexuals maintain they make up 10% of the population, despite statistical evidence to the contrary, which they ignore saying it's biased. Likewise, the "No moon landing" whackos claim that about 6% of the population are on board with them, which is probably an exaggeration, but probably not by much.

This somewhat-hypothetical 3% number probably represents "All the society can stand:" and if the number goes above that, things get all screwy. It's possible things get all screwy if the number goes below that percentage, too.

I do feel like Discovery Channel and a whole bunch of other outlets are really aching to push up that number, though.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
more believe than you think

From the ’85 to ’90 I worked for an armored car company in Las Vegas. It was after my divorce so I spent a lot of time with the guys I worked with going to gun shops and getting into shooting competitions put on in said shops. I meet guys that wrote for Solider of Fortune magazine and many people in different gun clubs in southern Nevada. I can tell you there are more people that believe in Conspiracy theories than you might think.

I even had info that was passed to us by the FBI about an area militia group planning to hit our out of town truck. Conspiracy theories can and are dangerous and one of the problems is both major political parties feed into peoples paranoid fantasies if they think it will get them some votes. From the CIA sold crack in LA to Obama was not born in the country both parties say these ideas are nuts by day and fund groups passing this crap at night.

It does not help that the media will at times interview people with crazy ideas like they have something real to say. Or have shows on the history channel about an interesting Conspiracy theory. Now the history channel is cashing in on the doomsday craze it seems every weekend there is a show about 2012 or the anti Christ. And in these shows they repeat every Conspiracy theory on the internet like it could be real.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Thank you, 1.0!

That was brilliant and heartfelt and poignient and sad and funny.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Republibot 1.0
Republibot 1.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/02/2009
When I used to live in

When I used to live in Florida I worked as a coordinator for the local community access cable station. My job was mainly to teach non-professionals the basics of live-to-tape television production and then help them make their own non-commercial tv shows which would then be shown on the designated community access cable channel.

It was probably my favorite job of all time. In a day of work I would be involved in the morning with the local white supremist group, in the afternoon with the local branch of Jewish Anti-Defamation League, and in the evening with the local group of Black Muslim activists (which is different than the traditional Muslim activist groups...). And everyone would volunteer to help on each others' shows.

And the place was rife with Conspiracy Theorists.

And I loved every minute of it (though I am sure there were some half-minute increments in there that I wasn't too fond of). And part of the fun of the job was spending time with hugely diverse groups of people (both super liberal and super conservative) and discussing conspiracy theories as a fun kind of hobby. But at a certain point all I was doing was getting a front row seat view into the sadness of these peoples' lives and a taste of the fantasy world in which they lived. And I felt bad about it.

That is why I couldn't get more than three chapters through The DaVinci Code, because I heard all of that stuff in Florida in the late 80s and early 90s from people that, though I was very fond of them, all in one way or another had mental issues. And I was gob-smacked by the amount of people that found the whole book premise even vaguely believable (or readable or well written).

Our government can't even keep secret the most mundane of facts shared between two people, how are they going to keep secret anything of import or incriminating once a third person becomes invovled.

Conspiracy theory = cheap ideas for fiction books written by opportunistic bad writers.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
I never thought of that...

What you're saying is that in some ways, a belief in conspiracy theories is a calming, secure influence on people. "Well, the world may not be the way I want it to, but at least someone's minding the store." That's very interesting...the alternative, of course, is that if conspiracies aren't real (And they're not), then everything's just happening at random with no significance, and one is left to find meaning in their own activities or through religion.

As a corollary: A paranoid is always the center of attention in his/her own mind.

So ultimately, we could assume that Conspiracy Theories are a kind of ego defense mechanism to cope with an utterly meaningless, insignificant, sad life. Interesting.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
Conspiracy Theories and stupid people

The problem with the truth is it’s not fun and it also does not give you an excuse. Most people that believe in Conspiracy Theories start with the premise of my life sucks because the evil (insert hated group here) is stopping me. People would rather believe in Conspiracy Theories than look at their own short comings.

Also it is scary to some people to think that history just happens with little rime or reason. It scary to think that leaders of nations are just as clueless as the next guy, that wars, starvation and economic collapse happen because governments and leaders don’t have a clue to want they are doing. It is comforting to think that there is a plan for this entire mess even if the people doing the planning are evil and against you.

Look at what is happening now the government is just reacting to events you can tell that they have no plan. There is no end game to the bank bailout or the war or to anything that is happening that is why people are getting pissed. It is a harsh thing to discover that the President and congress are just as clueless as your boss at work. But with a Conspiracy Theory it can make a kind of sense.

One of the reasons for the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories are it’s hard for people to except that the people that did the attacks are barking at the moon nuts. Just look at it here we have a group of people that somehow think that attacking a country that has the most powerful military in human history was a good idea and thought that we would just roll over and give up. It boggles the mind to think that people that crazy could walk around and no one noticed. It is easier for some to think there had to be some sort of conspiracy by the government than to think a bunch of nutjobs half a world away would or could do such a thing. Our intelligence agencies would have to be incompetent for it to happen and people just can’t except that they were incompetent.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Status

Bleeding Heart does not have a status.

Latest Status Updates

10000li Just watched final touchdown of shuttle and shuttle program. 1 year ago
Jim Stiles my toe hurts (had half the nail removed) 1 year ago
Republibot 3.0 "Bigness" is a word? http://photoblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/07/18/7106557-first-views-of-vesta-from-orbit 1 year ago
Republibot 3.0 The fantastic and amazing "Astronautix.com" website is no more, victim of Denial Of Service attacks. No idea who would do such a thing. 1 year ago
Republibot 3.0 I just got done interviewing SF actor Brent Stait. Really fun to talk to. The interview will run next Monday. 1 year ago
SheldonCooper @Republibot 3.0 prayers are appreciated, always, but we're really not that bad off. just kinda inconvenienced, really. but thanks! 1 year ago
SheldonCooper @10000li the destruction was very localized (only my building and the one next to it were destroyed) and so the need may not be high enough 1 year ago