FAN FILM REVIEW: "The Hunt for Gollum" (2009)

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture

This is not science fiction, but since so many SF series - most notably Babylon 5 - have drawn from the Middle Earth Stories, and since we expressed interest in it recently on the site ( ) It seems only fitting and fair that I review this fan film.

Technically an "Interquel" rather than a sequel or prequel, this story is set solidly between "The Hobbit" and the first "Lord of the Rings" movie. I really loved the LOTR series, the look, the feel, the scope. the grandure of it all, but to be fair, I'm more in to Peter Jackson than I am in to Tolkein, and most of my interest in the trilogy was simply to see what the man could do when he wasn't making sheep explode or killing zombies with a lawnmower (And to be fair, no one kills zombies with a lawnmower like Mr. Jackson does!). Growing up the Bakshi and Rankin Bass versions of middle earth pretty much killed any interest I may have had in fantasy as a genre, and I had no particular interest in it. Had it been another director than Jackson, I probably wouldn't have even watched it.

But they were great movies that I adored, and it even prompted me to read The Hobbit and slog my way through most of the first LOTR book before it kicked my ass. My point being that while I totally dig what Jackson did, and I've developed an appreciation for the story and setting as a whole by extension, I'm probably not the idea target audience for this story.

I just feel it's important to set that up before we go any further. Also, there'll be spoilers.


Gollum leaves his hidey-hole to try and get The One Ring back. Gandalf tells Aragorn about this, and Aragorn agrees to track and capture Gollum. This he then does, fairly easily and without incident. He then runs afowl of a platoon of Orks, and Gollum gets away in the fray. As Aragorn hunts for the little creep, Elves show up and say they've captured him. Back at Elf Command, Gandalf tortures Gollum for information, but finds little of use. Gandalf and Aragorn confer briefly on what their next move should be, and then the wizard heads off for The Shire, setting up the first movie.



I loved the look and feel of this. It's a great love letter to the seminal Jackson trilogy, with all the sets, props, costumes, and prosthetic makeup looking as though it were actually pilfered from a backlot. It looks great, and everything has the right heft to it. There's none of the threadbare quality that sometimes comes from Fan Films, and this is a much more ambitious attempt at a fan film than I, personally, have seen before. Though I've seen longer films, and more opulent films, I've never seen one in the fantasy genre that looked and worked this well before. It is truely a labor of love, and it shows. The only immediate stylistic quibble that fans might have with it is that it lacks Howard Shore's very celtic score. That's not really an issue for me, though, as I always felt the score was the weakest part of the Jackson movie. The synthestra music throughout this fan film is a more-than-adequate replacement, and in some places, such as when the synth choir comes in, it's really really good.

Acting is all quite good, with everyone channeling their official counterparts quite well. Arwen didn't quite work for me, mainly I think because of my completely inappropriate lust for Liv Tyler, but also because her ears were much more pronounced in this film than in the official series, and I found that a bit distracting. She's a very minor character in "Hunt," however, so it's not a dealbreaker.

This is, on the whole, a very good fan film and the makers should be very proud of themselves for having done it.

There are a couple things that didn't quite work for me, though, and I don't think that's entirely my fault. In fact, had I been more of an avid Tolkeinophile, I might not have noticed at all.

Firstly, I understand by it's nature as an interquel that they're very limited as to what they can do without violating the established continuity. That's fine, I get that. Also, given how important this material is, they probably don't feel free to give full run to their imagination. Unfortunately, this kind of limits what they can do with the story. My synopsis above hits all the major points, and it's pretty breif, so what I'm getting at here is that - as politely as I can put this - it feels like there's more running time to this film than there is story.

I started off being amazed by the look and feel of the whole enterprise, but clocking in at forty minutes, and with a plot that resembles one of the Stargate Franchise's infamous "Walking through the woods" episodes, to be honest, I found myself getting a bit bored from time to time. This is livened up by a run in with another ranger, the orks, and a wraith at the end, and some clever montage editing in a few places, but to be honest, not all that much happens. And given the limitations of the well-known stories on either end, there's really not all that much that *could* have happened, you know? Nothing that a a ruthlessly vicious edit wouldn't fix, though: If they whittled this down by about ten minutes, it would be fantastic. If they whittled it down to about half it's run time, it'd probably be the best fanfilm of all time.

But at the same time, I understand why they can't do that, because much of the heft of the film is based on the slow burn of the actors, the long glances, the slow transitions, which give it all more gravity, and make it feel more, well, important. It's a thin line between gravitas and ponderousness, however, and on occasion "Hunt for Gollum" jumps back and forth over that line.

This is still a very impressive production, however, and well worth checking out whatever Writer/Director Chris Bouchard and company do next. Despite some narative dialation in this film, he's obviously an expert at setting mood and style, and he's clearly a person of no small ambition as well. Count me in as a fan!

And feel free to disagree with my review! Check it out for yourself, the entire film is available online here:



You didn't get to "The Council of Elrond," huh?

Your synopsis is basically what Aragorn and Gandalf told the council in "Fellowship." So, no spoilers!

And it's "orcs."

But you did a better job than I'd do reviewing a Babylon 5 fan film. I'm more a fantasy guy than a sci-fi guy.

Bakshi rules!

Bakshi rules?

Republibot 1.0's picture

Man, Bakshi's Lord of the Rings just totally put me off Tolkein for like 20 years when it came out.

All the behind the scenes politics to get the thing made aside, the rotoscoping thing that he loves so much is just so cheesey. Isn't it nice to know Mr Bakshi that the animation technique that you pioneered and championed got a digital overhaul and creeps people out in bank commercials.

American Pop was similar but with a better selling soundtrack.

I do have me some love for Wizards though.

The thing I never got about Wizards...

Republibot 3.0's picture why the chick is so fat. I mean, she's clearly supposed to be attractive but...uhm...she's not. Also, all that rotoscoped WWII footage w/ tanks badly re-drawn in to more beastial looking tanks got old real quick. But I stayed awake through that one, which is not something I can commonly say of Mr. Bakshi's work.

@ Mike:
To be honest, I don't remember. The book kicked my butt, and part of that long, unequal struggle between me and the page involves me getting punch-drunk on exposition and having only vague, delirious memories of exposition that goes on and on and on and on and may or may not have involved a surprise appearance of Santa Clause. (Or was that The Chronicles of Narnia?) Seriously, I was so bewildered in my lowbrow way by the time I gave up on it that you could have thrown The Tick and Arthur in there, and I wouldn't have even recognized them.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

You mean you don't worship Tolkien?!

Fair enough. LOTR is my favorite book, but I totally understand what you're saying. It either speaks to you or it doesn't, and that's fine either way. (You'll laugh at me, but "Shadow of the Past," and "The Council of Elrond" are entirely lengthy exposition and are my two favorite chapters in the whole book.)

@1.0 - I'd read LOTR before I saw the Bakshi movie, and it was so true to the story that I had to love it.

I know rotoscoping has gotten a bad name, but when I was 10(?) it was the coolest thing ever. I'm not sure why it still isn't.

I'm just not a fantasy guy

Republibot 3.0's picture

I realize there isn't much difference between fantasy and SF - they just use a different basis for the impossible things that happen in them, and the LOTR movies have helped me develop a bit more appreciation for that, but I'm just not a fantasy guy. I get uncomfortable if there's not ray guns and rocket ships around. I prefer aliens to elves. I'm shallow like that.

OTOH, I've read the bible a half dozen times cover to cover, and most people can't seem to plow through that, but I find it endlessly fascinating, so maybe I'm just inherently weird. I dunno.

Rotoscoping has been used since the earliest days of animation. The Fleischer Brothers used it a lot, as here where they Rotoscoped version of Cab Calloway in to a cartoon in order to catch his very distinctive and odd stage movement (Check out the odd ghost dance) and Disney used it to pad out crowd and dance sequences in Snow White and elsewhere. I don't really understand the bad rap, as it's distinctive, neat looking, and easy to do, but the upper classes still look down on that rock and roll the kids love so much, so maybe it's just a case of it being considered beneath the dignity of more serious art.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0