Skip to Content

EPISODE REVIEW: Warehouse 13: “Breakdown” (Episode 10)

Republibot 3.0's picture

Warehouse 13 pulls out a win tonight, and no one is happier than me. Though they’ve only had one truly awful episode thus far (The Lewis Caroll’s Mirror one), I have to admit I’ve never been fully invested in this show, and the last three or four episodes have begun to feel like drudgery to watch. No, that’s too harsh. It wasn’t drudgery, never that bad, but it’s something I found it hard to look forward to. Thus I’m really glad they were able to get a really solid hit tonight, even if they haven’t really knocked one out of the park yet. It helps rebuild my never-quite-established-in-the-first-place faith in the show.

PLAY BY PLAY

It’s a slow day. Myka and Pete have it off, Artie is just delivering reports by courier to the shadowy cabal that Mrs. Fredericks works for, and Claudia is just doing maintenance crap in the warehouse itself. Claudia fixes a robot vacuum cleaner (And just as an aside, that might be the first time in my life that I’ve ever managed to spell “Vacuum” correctly on the first go. And this was the second. “I’m learnding!”), and then goes on to fix Artie’s zipline, and she’s using artifacts to cool down her drinks, thus proving she learned nothing last week. While working on the zipline, the robo-vacuum she fixed (Badly) goes screwy and knocks her, so she ends up sliding down the zipline, screaming semi-comedicly and then the line disconnects, dropping her and knocking over a whole bunch of evil artifacts stored on the storage shelves in the warehouse, including - among other things - an dodgeball and some cans of silly string, both presumably evil.

Pete and Myka, having no lives of their own, come by the warehouse to check on Claudia, and quickly realize they’re getting alarms all over the place for active artifacts, the Zipline is down, and the girl’s missing. They follow the downed line to try and find her, eventually running afoul of the dodge ball. It’s no longer presumably evil, we discover that it was an Army training dodgeball (really) that was involved in a bludgeoning death of several cadets in 1970. After some mild slapstick, Pete solves that one (He catches the dodge ball), but as always they over-sell his goofyness. Then they come across some unexplained lightning, then they find an exact duplicate of Lena’s Bed and Breakfast INSIDE the warehouse, with a Claudia-shaped hole in the roof.

They go in, but before Claudia can warn them not to let the door close, they let the door close, and find they’re basically in an infinitely recursive painting. If Pete goes out the front door, he comes back in through a side door, if he jumps through a window, he instantly flies back in through the next one. Claudia tried climbing out through the hole she made in the roof, and ended up coming in through the chimney. Eventually, they surmise there must have been an artifact in Lena’s house that they couldn’t remove, so they moved the WHOLE house in here, and rebuilt a duplicate. Stupid theory, but hey, this is a stupid show. They quickly notice the painting they’re recursing through, and after some pretty funny trial and error they presently find their way out.

Claudia checks some backup monitors she put on the floor over Artie’s objections (“Why are you wasting time putting backup monitors on the floor, wayward redhaired girl?” or something like that. It was funny), and she realizes that the “Gooery” that pumps the “Gack” that keeps the artifacts from “Artifacting” is blocked up somehow and about to go blooey, and a prerecorded version of Ms. Fredericks’ voice comes on the PA to inform them they’ve only got about 10 minutes to fix it or die. To get to the Gooery fastest, they decided to cut through the “Dark Vault” where the really dangerous stuff is kept, and, well, it’s less than impressive, visually speaking. It looks a lot like a church Halloween haunted house, to be honest. None the less, Pete manages to get enthralled by Sylvia Plath’s typewriter, and it’s killing him. (“Syivia Plath was an emotionally disturbed writer who took her own life and…” “Myka, I spent a lot of time *IN* the Bell Jar. I know who Sylvia Plath was.” “Oh, sorry.”) Myka sends Claudia on to fix the Gooery while she tries various not-very-clever methods of getting Pete away from the evil typewriter’s sphere of influence, then she just hits

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
she totally strays from the career woman discussion

Or does she? I mean, she came back from the dead just to finish her job, and found the love of a bald dude on the way...

I'm joking, of course.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Falconlady
Offline
Joined: 09/03/2009
Mmmmulllteeee caaaarrrrd, Mul-Tee-Card, MULTICARD

I liked Leeloo too, but she totally strays from the career woman discussion.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Kaylee

Yeah, I had a wildly inappropriate crush on Kaylee. (But curiously not Dr. Keller from SG:A - I guess it was the character more than the actress). I liked Dee from the new Galactica, though they never seemed to know what to do with her, and on a different level I liked Roslin, until she got all fascist and incoherent in the last 25 episodes or so. Though impossibly smart, I always liked Sam from SG1 since she *was* allowed to be smart and female, and no one ever made a huge deal out of it. Also, she tends to act like a career military woman, rather than the "Dude in a dress" types you tend to see in series SF (Major Kira, the new Starbuck, etc). Dr.

And of course the impossibly perfect Leeloo from 5th Element, but again we're drifting back towards inappropirate crushes.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Falconlady
Offline
Joined: 09/03/2009
Agree w 2/0/3.0

I think women that are true friends with their men and still like them are less likely to be inclined to chick lit/flicks. Some of them do much of the Superwoman stuff but aren't down on themselves for what they don't get to. Some would find happiness anywhere you dropped them.

The ones who like Sci Fi have usually ignored or rejected popular media requirements for women. And, of course, those are the female characters I find most interesting -- such as Temperence Brennan in Bones, Kaylee Frye in Firefly, all the women in Eureka.

sysadmin 2.0
sysadmin 2.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/23/2008
Yeah....

The good news is, it appears that even after all these years, the Republispouse still likes him.

Republibot 36-24-36 says that if you look at who writes these things, they tend to be either bitter divorcees, the naif college overeducated or just hate men for whatever reason.
(I paraphrase. Her rant was longer)

She hates chick-lit and chick-flicks btw,

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Troubling the deep waters

Yeah, curiosity and cats, over and over again. Story of my life.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
R3 goes where angels fear to tread.

as a male ( and having been married twice) I take the 5th.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Undoubtedly it's difficult being a chick.

Women outnumber men, very slightly, but traditionally are under-represented politically by a huge margin, there *is* a glass ceiling, and generally lower income, and most *acceptable* jobs for women are still either nurturing jobs, or clerical, or food-service, so I get that society isn't completely equitable, nor even terribly close to it.

At the same time, the demands society puts on women are much greater than the demands it puts on men - the definition of beauty is *extremely* narrow, but there's a hundred kinds of handsome - and some of the women I know spent so very much time on superficial things in their youth that they effectively have no skills other than looking pretty, which - as any stripper will tell ya' - doesn't last forever. This is not all women, it's not even the women I prefer to associate with, but I do see it. A lot.

But I find that a number of women seem to feel they're a failure if they can't have perpetual good looks, wildly successful and exciting careers of some sort, a thrilling love life, and, of course, a family, all at the same time. And of course you've got to be Martha Stewart, too. There's this 1970s concept of an empowered Helen Gurley Brown kind of lifestyle that, let's face it, is not feasable for any but a tiny minority of people, and no matter how obvious that is, there's chicks who seem to feel like total failures in life simply because they can't work all day, dance all night, and travel to exotic places on the weekends, while never neglecting their kids and getting the laundry done.

From an outsiders perspective, it seems as though women completely bypassed "Equality" and tried to jump straight from "Housewife" to "Superhuman" without ever really considering that it's not really possible. I've often wondered if attempting to measure up to the completely impossible standards by which female "Success" is measured might not be the cause of a hell of a lot of problems on it's own.

And if it *IS* then obviously lashing out at/denegrating menfolk would be a fairly predictable symptom.

Whadya' think? Am I near the mark? Quite wide of it? I'm asking: I legitimately don't know.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Falconlady
Offline
Joined: 09/03/2009
Tearing down

Unfortunately, tearing down is "in" generally. "Mean girls" are cool. Cheerleaders were popular in my high school but never as mean as pop media make them out to be. I'm surprised to see this approach now that girls can do practically anything, but the lack of confidence in other continues to motivate behavior that surprises me.

I think the tearing down approach is for the moms who were brought up to think they can do anything and they're not right now and frustrated and how did they get that way? A man was involved.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Thank you, Fornax and Falconlady

Always nice to be agreed with.

I should point out - for the benefit of some of our male readers - that "Chick Show" isn't a perjorative. If you look at romantic comedies from the 1930s and 40s - Bringing up Baby, and Philadelphia Story and arguably It's A Wonderful Life - they're very definitely chick shows that are engaging to men. The guys in them are likeable, generally decent, frequently flawed individuals and the women in them are decent, frequently above-average folk. The storie are lovey-dovey, but their goal was to keep the men involved in the story while the women swooned, and I think that's an admirable goal. Modern romantic comedies have gone too far over to the chick side of things, and mostly ignore guys, except as objects of desire and/or annoyance. I'm not saying I'll ever watch a show that's dripping with cooties like The Gilmore Girls, but "Chick Show" isn't automatically a bad thing.

I do wish they'd shoot outside Vancouver, too. They did it for budgetary reasons, but now that the US dollar is worth less than the Canadian dollar, I had hopes we'd see more visually diverse location shots. Evidently not.

Falconlady, any idea why it is that "Women's Literature" seems to like to build women up by tearing men down at the moment? I know it's just a trend, but I always hated SF that treated women like dopes, I'm less than thrilled at the 'turnabout' angle...

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Falconlady
Offline
Joined: 09/03/2009
Like Chick Show Def

3.0 has a fair point about what makes a chick show, but since this is Sci Fi, it's a light version.

My book club continues to choose books that portray men as abusive, mean, weak, stupid, and worthless. I have had them read a Sci Fi book, "Mote in God's Eye," and "Galileo's Daughter." They are amazed about how different these books are than their typical Oprah fare and express interest but I doubt they would pick up a similar book themselves.

In this case, though, Artie is sweet and cuddly underneath and Pete is sweet and brave. Neither of them beat women or deny women the opportunity to do what they want.

That's why I call this a light version of a chick show.

Fornax (not verified)
Not bad

I thought it was a decent episode. Lots of peril with some action beats. The Dark vault shows promise, the stories of some of those objects could be interesting to explore in the future. Totally agree with you about Claudia. She was threatening to become extremely annoying with her Whedonese. And as you said, the less Leena the better. Her "aura" moments can make one wince.

Oh, and I do think that was the SAME diner used in a past Stargate episode. I can't remember which one but I don't think it was the Daniel episode. I wish Hollywood would start shooting TV shows some where else besides Vancouver, I think we've seen the entire city by now. This continent is pretty big you know.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Chick show

Well, Syfy has deliberately positioned this as a 'chick show', so maybe they're deliberately playing the male characters as stupid (Pete) and unattractive (Artie) so as to keep them from overshadowing the female characters? Dunno.

That said, I did enjoy this episode more than most.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
It was not a stinker but I will not remember it next week.

The diner scene was almost the same as the same scene from a SG1 episode where Daniel has to decide to ascend again or go back to being human. The minute the old guy flipped the sign to closed that flashed into my mind.

I wish the writing for Pete and Myka would get better it's bad when the supporting cast has better stuff than the so called leads. I'm sorry but the actor playing Pete must have something on the producer or something I just don't see that he is any good. But maybe that's what is holding Myka and Pete back the fact that Eddie McClintock is not that good an actor.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Status

Bleeding Heart does not have a status.

Latest Status Updates

Ginrummy Ray Harryhausen, Visual Effects Master, Dies Aged 92 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper Iron Man 3 review will be live first thing in the morning! 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Second, it reminds us to never stop looking to the future and trying to make it better. Everything Trek's ever stood for 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Observing a fictional event like First Contact Day is, first and foremost, just fun. 2 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: can you comemorate an event before it happens? Or what about celebrating an event that didn't, like September 13th, 1999? 3 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long according to Star Trek, April 5, 2063 will be the day we make FC with the Vulcans. Thus, April 5 is FC day 3 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: Huh? First contact day? 5 weeks ago