Skip to Content

EPISODE REVIEW: Caprica: “Things we Lock Away” (Episode 11)

Republibot 3.0's picture

NOTE: I initially posted this episode under the wrong title. Sorry for the confusion.

Hoo boy.

Some of you have asked me why I title these things “Episode 9” or whatever, and not “Season 1, Episode 9.” The obvious reason is that I have never believed this show will get a second season, and the ratings since it’s return bear that out: Neither of the last two episodes have broken a million viewers. In fact, they haven’t even come in close. The best this show *ever* did, after six months of hype, was 1.6 million viewers for the premier. There have been waxes and wanes, but in general, the ratings have hovered around 1.1 million viewers. Since the return, it’s dropped around 200,000 of those. At $3 million per episode, last week’s installment paid something like $3.57 per viewer. Obviously, the show can’t survive that.

Anyway…

PLAY BY PLAY

The Lucians are…oh, no, wait, that’s Stargate: Universe. Whoops. Uhm…yeah: Amanda Greystone continues spying on creepy Clarisse, and ultimately manages to infiltrate her weird bisexual group-marriage cult family. They don’t look glad to see her.

MEANWHILE, said creepy bisexual group marriage cult family is keeping Lacey drugged as a prisoner in the attic, and most of the men seem to want to kill her. She gives information to Clarisse about where she thinks a backup copy of the Zoe avatar is hidden. Clarisse sends her - unwillingly - to the STO training facility on Geminon.

MEANWHILE, Daniel retakes control of his company. He attempts to form a pact with Vergis, and together they’d take down the mob, but Vergis tricks Daniel into killing him in a pretty darn good scene.

MEANWHILE, because the budget was already spent for this week, Zoe and Tamara spend all their scenes swordfighting in the sand. Then they abruptly decide to be friends.

MEANWHILE, Zoe keeps seeing another version of herself, both in real time and in flashbacks, and she claims the other Zoe rescued her from the house fire when she was little.

MEANWHILE, in flashbacks, we discover the process that led to the creation of the Cylons and the Avatars.

OBSERVATIONS

I have gone on record repeatedly saying that I really like this show, and I’m actually saddened that it’s going to bite the death nugget. That said, it’s hard not to feel a bit disappointed in these last three episodes. They meander, they lack the candor of the earlier ones. I can’t really explain it, and it’s not a devastating change, but there is definitely something missing. The change in writing staff, perhaps? But that happened around episode six, I thought.

The “Other Zoe,” I think, has to be a Galactican-styled angel, like Ghost Six and Ghost Baltar from BSG. That’s the only thing that makes any sense, and it kind of turns Zoe into a trinity somewhat like they alluded to in the third episode: Original Dead Zoe (Body), Avatar Zoe (Mind), Angel Zoe (Spirit). If this other Zoe *is* an angel, then it follows that “God” (“You know He hates being called that”) from BSG is manipulating all this hoo-hah from day one. If this is the case, then it argues strongly that the Cylon/BSG God really is a divinity, and not simply a computer program, or a misunderstanding, or a hyper-evolved Kobolian AI or V’ger returning to earth, or some muddled Roddenberryesque tripe like that. Interesting, though basically we’re just exchanging one kind of muddle for another.

The whole Tauron thing about "Controlling your return to the soil" was pretty cool, and very Roman. I wonder, for like the zillionth time, who the patron Olympians of each colony are.

Zoe seems to be the only one in the show who realizes the avatars may be alive, but they’re not *really* the dead people. Everyone else - Clarisse, Daniel, Tamara - seem unable to grasp this. The way it’s presented, I have to think it’s confusing the audience, too.

As ever, Eric Stoltz effortlessly owns every scene he touches, and should I ever have an SF show of my own, I’m hiring him on day one. I don’t care what the part is, or what the show is, I want him in it. I like his wheels-within-wheels nature, and the fact that he’s a very bad man, but unwilling to completely give into it. I like that he’s convinced himself he can be redeemed, though clearly it ain’t an option. Note how, last week, when he was being overtly evil, he had a beard, and this week, now that he’s attempting to redeem himself, he’s cleanshaven again.

For whatever reason, Joe Adama’s character ended up being pretty much unable to carry any plot or interest. I’m assuming the preponderance of Clarisse in the last six episodes or so is a result of that. In essence they’ve demoted co-lead Esai Morales to minor status, and promoted minor Paula Malcomson to Co-lead. It’s weird.

I can’t help thinking it’s a mistake. First of all, it divides the action between the generally pretty fascinating Dynasty-in-Space aspects of the show and the generally incoherent religious aspects. Secondly, I can think of a jillion better foils for the series. Heck, I’d have been happy to see Greystone square off against that irritating Cliff Barnes…excuse me, Tomas Vergis every week. And thirdly, I just don’t like Clarisse.

I don’t like her on any level. I don’t like the character, the acting, the dialog, the muddled motivations, the story, the actress, you name it, I don’t like it. One could argue that this is because I’m a Christian, and I can’t completely discount that. Just the same, I really enjoy explorations of religion and faith in Science Fiction, and I’ve long been a fan of it. Granted, BSG’s efforts in this direction were uneven at best, and ultimately completely crapped out in the end in a way that, say, Babylon 5 or Lost or “The Divine Invasion” did not.

But seriously, whatever my biases, the depiction of Clarisse’ whacky dope smoking swinger cult is just a narrative mess from start to finish. None of it makes a lick of sense. We don’t really know why they’re monotheistic, we don’t know how the movement started, who founded, why, or when. We don’t know what they believe (Believing in one God is one thing, what said God expects of you is entirely another, and there’s wiiiiiiiiiide divergence in that amongst the monotheistic faiths in the real world). We don’t know why they’re terrorists, excepting perhaps a liberal bias against monotheism in general, lumping all of us in with the Taliban and the IRA. There doesn’t appear to be any kind of moral code, nor any kind of ethical one. It just doesn’t make any sense. And without a sense of what they believe, there is no foundation to the stuff they do. They could be blowing up people one day, and wearing pink bunny suits and hanging people from trees in worship of Odin the next, and it would all make about the same level of sense.

There is little more annoying in life than a bad story badly told, and these aspects of Caprica - an otherwise fine show - are heading pretty solidly in that direction.

WILL CONSERVATIVES LIKE THIS SHOW?

No.

NOTE: I initially posted this episode under the wrong title. Sorry for the confusion.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Blood and Chrome

Interesting. We covered this a while back when it was intended as a webseries. I have to agree with you, there's really no way this could be taken as anything apart from a "We made a terrible mistake greenlighting Caprica" kind of thing.

And before they even start shooting, there's a continuity error: In "Razor" it is made very, very clear that Bill Adama's first mission is the very last mission of the war. Based on the article, this movie is set six years before the end of the war.

Sloppy but lucrative.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
New BSG show

SyFy is going to do a new prequel of BSG so I think Caprica is dead.

http://www.tvsquad.com/2010/10/22/syfy-adama-blood-and-chrome/

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Ok, this one at least I got...

>>>Hmmm. I hadn't thought of this before, but we never really had any indication that they were in on Clarice's murderous doings, did we? And suddenly they don't really think anything about imprisoning a drugged teenage girl in the attic? I don't know about you, but that would have raised eyebrows in my family.<<<

They've never come out and said it, but it's been implied from day one that at least some of her spouses were in on it. I think now they're just assuming the whole swinger's club is a cell.

>>>Then the next scene we see with them they're leaving the cabin and Clarice is talking about how much she will miss it. Ooookay. I guess Amanda is going to the creepy cult marriage home to spy for the inept police inspector. We saw that introduced as a plot element, right? Uh, not really. Amanda just went home, stayed for what, an hour or two before Clarice shows up again. And then they go to the creepy cult marriage house, again for no clear reason<<<

Ok, *That* much at least I got: Amanda wants to go to Clarice' house, but Clarice says no because she's got a kidnapped teenager in the attic, and for all we know five or six more in the basement. She goes home. Lacey tells her that the MacGuffin is in Amanda's possession, so she gets Lacey out of the house, then invites Amanda over for coffee and some light group sex and indoctrination.

What I *didn't* get is why they kept Lacey in the attic for a week without even asking her any questions, though she was more than willing to cooperate. And frankly the whole friday night sex party family is entirely superfluous to the plot thus far, isn't it? I can't think of a single thing they've added to it, apart from the creep factor. (And in fact, I respect creep factor, but if a creepy person/organization isn't actually contributing to the story, if they're just sitting in the corner being quietly creepy and reading People Magazine, it's not really contributing, is it?)

>>>And it's probably best she left before the whole Vergis thing, too. That would have been awkward. But the whole time I'm watching the Vergis thing, I can't escape this trivial nagging question: "Did Daniel even know she came home for an hour?"<<<

Heh heh. I was thinking that same thing.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Flabbergasted
Offline
Joined: 10/20/2010
Creepy bisexual cult marriage

Creepy bisexual cult marriage family...

Hmmm. I hadn't thought of this before, but we never really had any indication that they were in on Clarice's murderous doings, did we? And suddenly they don't really think anything about imprisoning a drugged teenage girl in the attic? I don't know about you, but that would have raised eyebrows in my family. LOL.

I remember one of the things I found jarring about this last episode was Clarice and Amanda. Clarice is leaving the creepy bisexual cult marriage family to go to cabin in an undisclosed location to be with Amanda. Okay. Whatever. Then the next scene we see with them they're leaving the cabin and Clarice is talking about how much she will miss it. Ooookay. I guess Amanda is going to the creepy cult marriage home to spy for the inept police inspector. We saw that introduced as a plot element, right? Uh, not really. Amanda just went home, stayed for what, an hour or two before Clarice shows up again. And then they go to the creepy cult marriage house, again for no clear reason. Hopefully, they won't keep her in the attic.

And it's probably best she left before the whole Vergis thing, too. That would have been awkward. But the whole time I'm watching the Vergis thing, I can't escape this trivial nagging question: "Did Daniel even know she came home for an hour?"

There are lot of potentially good ideas in Caprica. It's a shame it seems to have ADD.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
The RDM style...

Yeah, I agree. The basic Galactica concept - while inherently goofy - had a lot of potential. RDM deserves some credit for exposing that, though I'd say it took him the better part of a season to get to that point (His pilot and first season are pretty crappy up until "The Hand of God.") Once he finally hit what he was going for, he was kinda' in the zone for a season and change, apparently guiding the series by artistic insight rather than plotting. He got the reputation of being a genius, but then it all went to crap. Maybe he started believing his press, maybe he was simply done in by his large cast and refusal to kill off any of his characters, even when they had nothing left to contribute to the show. (Seriously, did Baltar do anything useful in the last 30 episodes? Was there a point to stretching Roslin out that long?)

Likewise, I think the concept of "The Sopranos meets Dallas...in space!" has some inherent neatness to it, but it was a great and utter mistake shoehorning it into the Galacticaverse when it had initially been intended as a completely unrelated standalone show set on earth.

And, as Neo points out, the Monotheists seem to be at odds with their own concept, both of and against a thing simultaneously. It just doesn't make any frackin' sense.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Flabbergasted
Offline
Joined: 10/20/2010
I agree that the religion in

I agree that the religion in Caprica makes no sense. If the monotheists are being oppressed to the point of becoming terrorists, you would expect them to be decentralized and organically growing, kind of like early Christianity in the Roman Empire. Islamic terrorist groups today operate much like that against their governments or other foreign forces.

But no. Instead, they have a giant Vatican City which explicitly directs an active terrorist arm. So, given all the grief over the train bombing and everything else, the obvious question is why do the other worlds put up with this nonsense? It would seem like Gemanon would be at war with the other worlds pretty darn quick. At the very least, they wouldn't offer regularly scheduled flights there for anyone who wants to go.

Of course, the police on Caprica do seem hopelessly stupid. I got a big kick out of that detective sitting in his car with all the dramatic facial shots while classical music played. What occurred to me was this: "You know, you've been on this case for how many months? And your file consists of yellowed, cut-out newspaper articles. No wonder you're not getting anywhere."

Sadly, I have come to the conclusion that these Moore productions are all style over substance. The basic BSG idea he borrowed simply had enough intrinsic substance that it held the thing together for a while.

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
Bad writing

The major failure of Caprica is not articulating the motivations of the different groups in this universe. Why do the polytheist majority suppresses the monotheists? Why are the people from Tauron in criminal gangs? Finally what is it the monotheist believe?

Zoe stated she turned to the STO because she was disgusted with the hedonism of the world but Clarice is shown to be in some weird swingers idea of a polygamist marriage. These two ideas do not track with each other a religion can't be both moralistic and hedonist it just does not work. The idea that the monotheist would turn to terrorism because of there suppression would work if we knew why they are suppressed on all but one of the colonies.

The only character that seems to have a clear motivation is Danial and religion in his case is just window dressing not a main or even an important factor.

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Tesselation

>>>If I felt inclied to watch BSG or any of its spawn, I would probably agree with your interpretation of their depiction of religion.<<<

I've got to clarify: I totally agree with Neo that people criticizing a group they know little about is going to result in stuff that is incoherent at worst and propagandistic at best. I'm not sure I agree with his interpretation of *why* these aspects of Caprica are so terrible, though. It *might* be exactly like he says, it might be a simple case of hacks saying "Oh, we've got magic in the show? Then we can do anything we want, and screw the rules, bwa-ha-ha-ha!" It could be someone trying to make a very dated political statement on the nature of religious violence. It could be any number of things, but whatever it is, it increasingly sucks out loud.

>>What was funny to me was the Moebius-strip like quality of the comment. Almost like Escher's "Drawing Hands" but the hands are drawing each other inaccurately.<<<

Oh, now that *is* funny!

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
Hi, Flabbergasted

Hi, Flabbergasted, welcome to the site! Thanks for posting. Great screen name, by the way.

>>>Many nonreligious authors have written stories with compelling religious elements.<<<

Absolutely and totally agree. You don't need to believe in something to write a good story about it, you just need to be true to the dictates of the story itself. That's the "Creative" part of Creative writing.

>>>But back to my point. It's not bad enough that Battlestar Galactica ended by implying that the show was simply its Oz (I won't dignify it with the G word even if it is some stupid Q) having manipulated a pointless sequence of events.<<<

I have to say the ending of the RDM Galactica was quite literally the worst finale I've ever seen. I tried really hard to cut it some slack when it first aired, but within a couple days I simply still couldn't convince myself that it was anything but terrible. It is the first conclusion I've *ever* seen that was so bad it retroactively ruined the entire series. Yet to this day, seemingly intelligent people claim it was "Brilliantly complex" and a "Thematically deep" and "A satisfying conclusion" and so on. I attribute this to simple fanaticism.

As to Caprica, I hated the pilot movie (Still do), and went into this project grudgingly, assuming it'd at least be fun to write scathing review. I was pleasantly surprised. In the last three weeks I've felt like it's losing a wheel, however. I'm not sure if it fell off with this episode, but if it didn't, it's *barely* holding on.

Again, thanks for posting. Do feel free to hang out and talk some more.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

10000li
10000li's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/23/2009
Lost comment?

If I felt inclied to watch BSG or any of its spawn, I would probably agree with your interpretation of their depiction of religion.

What was funny to me was the Moebius-strip like quality of the comment. Almost like Escher's "Drawing Hands" but the hands are drawing each other inaccurately.

Or like this:

http://www.zogdo.com/innovation/spoof-art-escher-hands/

Flabbergasted
Offline
Joined: 10/20/2010
Rather Dismayed With Caprica

I guess I belong to the Templeton school of Battlestar Galactica thought, and I've followed your reviews of Caprica, which I've tried to develop an interest in. But I pretty well had a @#$@#$@$% momnt with this last episode.

Head Zoe?

Seriously? I mean... Head #&^#^#&^$&^ Zoe?

[And by the way, my prejudice is as follows: I don't think the religious parts of Caprica are written by people without religion trying to imagine religion. I think it's just a fundamental lack of imagination altogether. Many nonreligious authors have written stories with compelling religious elements.]

But back to my point. It's not bad enough that Battlestar Galactica ended by implying that the show was simply its Oz (I won't dignify it with the G word even if it is some stupid Q) having manipulated a pointless sequence of events. Or implying that its Oz was responsible for millenia of such nonsense. Or opening the door to the thought that absolutely no choices on a show ostensibly about choice meant anything with good old Oz pulling the strings.

No, apparently that wasn't bad enough. Now we have a Head character FLASHBACK. A sequence of events whose end we have already seen is now revealed to have been stage managed off screen by one of these Head Characters. So there really is no dramatic bottom. Oz is running this show, Oz is going to get what it wants, and the only reasonable conclusion is that these Head People are running around all over the place off screen (Amanda's brother, anyone?), doing whatever Oz needs. They're rubbing our face in the fact that no one is making an honest choice. They're all just well and truly puppets. What school of writing claims that's a reasonable dramatic plot device?

Flabbergasted
Offline
Joined: 10/20/2010
Rather Dismayed With Caprica

I guess I belong to the Templeton school of Battlestar Galactica thought, and I've followed your reviews of Caprica, which I've tried to develop an interest in. But I pretty well had a @#$@#$@$% momnt with this last episode.

Head Zoe?

Seriously? I mean... Head #&^#^#&^$&^ Zoe?

[And by the way, my prejudice is as follows: I don't think the religious parts of Caprica are written by people without religion trying to imagine religion. I think it's just a fundamental lack of imagination altogether. Many nonreligious authors have written stories with compelling religious elements.]

But back to my point. It's not bad enough that Battlestar Galactica ended by implying that the show was simply its Oz (I won't dignify it with the G word even if it is some stupid Q) having manipulated a pointless sequence of events. Or implying that its Oz was responsible for millenia of such nonsense. Or opening the door to the thought that absolutely no choices on a show ostensibly about choice meant anything with good old Oz pulling the strings.

No, apparently that wasn't bad enough. Now we have a Head character FLASHBACK. A sequence of events whose end we have already seen is now revealed to have been stage managed off screen by one of these Head Characters. So there really is no dramatic bottom. Oz is running this show, Oz is going to get what it wants, and the only reasonable conclusion is that these Head People are running around all over the place off screen (Amanda's brother, anyone?), doing whatever Oz needs. They're rubbing our face in the fact that no one is making an honest choice. They're all just well and truly puppets. What school of writing claims that's a reasonable dramatic plot device?

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
"Now, now: young minds, fresh ideas. We talked."

When I was a cub scout, we knew nothing about the browines, but we thought we did, and we made fun of them endlessly because of things they never did in the first place. We thought we knew what we were talking about - and we talked a lot - but we didn't.

A number of my conservative friends keep claiming that Muslims worship some kind of pagan "Moon god," and they insist they know what they're talking about - and they talk a lot - but of course they don't. (I'm a Christian, but I've read the Koran. Twice. I got some Muslim friends. Believe me: they most emphatically do not worship pagan gods. They're the most strident monotheists you'll ever meet)

Democrats accuse us Republicans of being bomb-throwing racist sexist religious fanatics bent on instituting a theocracy. Granted, that's true in Massachusetts, but it's generally not true elsewhere, and it's *Certainly* not universally true.

Believers like me frequently claim to know more about atheism than you atheists do. That drives me crazy, I can only imagine it bugs you too.

What Neo is saying is that if people decide to criticize a group they never belonged to, many of their criticisms are going to be based on hearsay, biases, and information that is far less specific than criticism members of that group might make. If a Catholic is critical of Catholicism, their criticism is probably more valuable than if a vehemently Protestant person is critical of Catholicism, simply because the Catholic knows more, and the Protestant knows little. (I'm a Protestant, by the way.)

I'm totally siding with Neo on this one.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

10000li
10000li's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/23/2009
You so funny!

"makes me think that this is a case of atheists that were raised as atheists writing about religion."

This is exactly what people mean when they type ROFLMAO!

Thanks!

Republibot 3.0
Republibot 3.0's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/27/2008
[Laughing]

It's possible, I guess. Religion has been part of BSG since the outset. TOG was produced by a Mormon, RDM describes himself as "A recovering Catholic," so they sorta' had to include it here, or else it frankly ain't Galactica. (Much like Star Wars ain't Star Wars without all that "Force" stuff)I certainly applaud their trying, and for the first five or six episodes, it was definitely very interesting, but concurrently with boosting Clarisse to a lead character, they seem to have lost their rudder on that one thread.

The Artist Formerly Known As Republibot 3.0

neorandomizer
neorandomizer's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/27/2009
Hang by your plot threads

The way the STO and their church is depicted in Caprica makes me think that this is a case of atheists that were raised as atheists writing about religion. They seem to not have a grasp of what a religion is and how a church operates inside a religious belief system. It's like ten year old virgins discussing sex they think they know what they they are talking about but in reality they have no clue.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Status

Bleeding Heart does not have a status.

Latest Status Updates

Ginrummy Ray Harryhausen, Visual Effects Master, Dies Aged 92 1 week ago
SheldonCooper Iron Man 3 review will be live first thing in the morning! 1 week ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Second, it reminds us to never stop looking to the future and trying to make it better. Everything Trek's ever stood for 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long Observing a fictional event like First Contact Day is, first and foremost, just fun. 2 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: can you comemorate an event before it happens? Or what about celebrating an event that didn't, like September 13th, 1999? 2 weeks ago
SheldonCooper @Kevin Long according to Star Trek, April 5, 2063 will be the day we make FC with the Vulcans. Thus, April 5 is FC day 3 weeks ago
Kevin Long @SheldonCooper: Huh? First contact day? 4 weeks ago